Do you have any idea which version this was fixed in?

Matt

On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 4:25:51 AM UTC-5, Jakob Kummerow wrote:
>
> Correct. This has been fixed in the meantime, but 3.28 is too old.
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Matt Broadstone <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to track down an eager deoptimization in my node.js code, and 
>> it seems to be directly related to a keyed lookup on an object using a 
>> string. There is a comment on an issue from May (
>> https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=3183#c12) that seems to 
>> indicate that the assumption is that keyed lookups are by number. Is that 
>> the case? Is it not possible for me to optimize this method if I require a 
>> keyed lookup by string?
>>
>> versions:
>>   node: v0.12.7
>>   v8: 3.28.71.19
>>
>> This is the stack for the triggered DEOPT, please let me know if further 
>> information would help:
>>
>> [optimizing 0x2d3900bd1609 <JS Function Codec.encode (SharedFunctionInfo 
>> 0x2d3900b27af9)> - took 0.820, 0.509, 0.214 ms]
>> [deoptimizing (DEOPT eager): begin 0x2d3900bd1609 Codec.encode (opt #34) 
>> @40, FP to SP delta: 56]
>>             Deferred TaggedToI: NaN
>>   translating Codec.encode => node=136, height=24
>>     0x7fff5fbff0a0: [top + 80] <- 0x373656140201 ; [sp + 96] 
>> 0x373656140201 <JS Object>
>>     0x7fff5fbff098: [top + 72] <- 0x331bd6004161 ; rbx 0x331bd6004161 
>> <true>
>>     0x7fff5fbff090: [top + 64] <- 0x3736561487c1 ; [sp + 80] 
>> 0x3736561487c1 <a BufferBuilder with map 0x28dbca62ad71>
>>     0x7fff5fbff088: [top + 56] <- 0xeb789d0f7f1 ; rdx 0xeb789d0f7f1 
>> <String[7]: boolean>
>>     0x7fff5fbff080: [top + 48] <- 0x31a4d47f5f88 ; caller's pc
>>     0x7fff5fbff078: [top + 40] <- 0x7fff5fbff0e0 ; caller's fp
>>     0x7fff5fbff070: [top + 32] <- 0x2d3900b7d7f9; context
>>     0x7fff5fbff068: [top + 24] <- 0x2d3900bd1609; function
>>     0x7fff5fbff060: [top + 16] <- 0x331bd6004121 <undefined> ; literal
>>     0x7fff5fbff058: [top + 8] <- 0x331bd6004121 <undefined> ; literal
>>     0x7fff5fbff050: [top + 0] <- 0x331bd6004121 <undefined> ; literal
>> [deoptimizing (eager): end 0x2d3900bd1609 Codec.encode @40 => node=136, 
>> pc=0x31a4d47f4edf, state=NO_REGISTERS, alignment=no padding, took 0.062 ms]
>> [deoptimizer unlinked: Codec.encode / 2d3900bd1609]
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matt
>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> v8-users mailing list
>> [email protected] <javascript:>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "v8-users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
v8-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"v8-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to