I suspect that profiling wasn't enabled at the time the function was compiled. In that case, the information required for mapping code positions back to line numbers isn't available.
Jane Chen <jxche...@gmail.com> schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016, 20:40: > Testing profiling against v8 4.6.88. > > I have functions that are exposed through accessor callbacks. In the > CpuProfileNode, the line and column numbers are 0 for these functions. Is > that expected? Is there anything I can do to get the real line and column > numbers? Is this something fixed in a later v8 release? > > Thanks! > > -- > -- > v8-users mailing list > v8-users@googlegroups.com > http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "v8-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to v8-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- v8-users mailing list v8-users@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to v8-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
