Well, its wrong terminology. Backwards. Shade tree vernacular that should be abandoned. Gerald J. Harvey Barlow wrote: > > Gerald, > > I've been an old car enthusiast since I was a preteen (and still haven't > grown up or lost the interest) and among car enthusiasts, a 4.10:1 gear has > always been referred to as a lower gear/higher numerical gear. I agree that > it is not correct from a scientific point of view but it has always been > commonly used among car people. Maybe it originates with the comparison to > shifting down to a lower gear as in a downshift from third gear (direct in > an old 3 speed) to second gear because the effect is the same as going to a > lower rear end gear i.e. from a 3.55 to a 4.10. > > Harvey > To unsubscribe or to change to a daily Digest, please go to http://www.airstream.net/vaclist/listoffice.html If replying back to this message, please delete all the unnecessary original text from your reply.
[VAC] Re: towing with vintage CARs
Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer Fri, 23 Feb 2001 19:03:41 -0800
- [VAC] Re: towing with vintage C... Scott & Lise Scheuermann
- [VAC] Re: towing with vint... Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer
- [VAC] Re: towing with vint... Tryke
- [VAC] Re: towing with vint... Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer
- [VAC] Re: towing with vint... Harvey Barlow
- [VAC] Re: towing with vint... Harvey Barlow
- [VAC] Re: towing with vint... Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer
- [VAC] Re: towing with vint... Robert Gill
- [VAC] Re: towing with vint... jim clark
- [VAC] Re: towing with vint... Harvey Barlow
