IMHO, I doubt that will work out. "High gear ratio" and "low gear ratio"
are natural terms, and, so long as the word "ratio" is included, they -*do*
stick to the numbers. Besides, I've had some experience with trying to get
people to change the way they talk, and it doesn't work.
- Dick
(5368)
At 12:17 PM 2/24/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>May I make the suggestion that we no longer refer to gear ratios on this
>list as being either high or low, lets please try to stick to the numbers,
>or refer to them as either an ecomony gearing, or tow gearing.
>
>Thank you!
>
>Scott Scheuermann, Co-Monitor
>
>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe or to change to a daily Digest, please go to
>http://www.airstream.net/vaclist/listoffice.html
>
>If replying back to this message, please delete all the unnecessary original
>text from your reply.
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
"I'm not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde
Dick Kenan Tel: 770-451-0672
Retired and loving it!
WBCCI # 5368, 28' 1995 Excella
Atlanta
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mindspring.com/~as5368/
To unsubscribe or to change to a daily Digest, please go to
http://www.airstream.net/vaclist/listoffice.html
If replying back to this message, please delete all the unnecessary original
text from your reply.
