bob basques wrote:
>
> You're not going to have to worry about your setup (now that I can see
> it, I feel comfortable saying it).
Thanks! I reached that conclusion, too. Actually, I'm grateful to
Harvey for raising the issue, since it's made me do a bunch of research
into the subject, and I think I'm doing OK.
> I'm a firm believer in a ratio theory over absolute lengths, as in the
> ratio of trailer length (actually trailer axle to towball) to tow
> vehicle wheelbase length (I suppose I should include a variable for
> rear axle overhang for the tow vehicle as well). I believe this(these)
> ratio(s) is/are more important than the individual vehicle lengths.
I've been wondering about that. I just measured the hitch to axle on
the Globetrotter, and it's 13', which is 156 inches. My puller's wheel
base is 110 inches. That's a trailer "front":wheelbase ratio of 1.42.
If I was using a standard cap 3/4 ton pickup, it would be 1.3, which is
a difference of 8.45%, which is measurable, but not that huge.
> I have a 3/4 Ton (standard Wheel base) Chevy Van that I pull my 31'
> Excella with, and using the Ratio theory, I believe my tow vehicle
> would be very close to the bottom limit of acceptable wheelbase.
>
> Now I haven't figured out yet what the optimum ratio is, but I'm sure
> someone will chime in on the subject.
I'd like to see some discussion of this.
> Nice Vehicle you have there (I always thought Land Rovers were the way
> to go), too expensive for my tastes.
Don't be fooled by the asking prices. Lots of people think I paid a lot
more for my truck than I actually did, because a few people ask
outrageous sums for them.
> Now since you only like to work on vehicles with bonnets, does this
> preclude swapping motors and transmissions from those other nasty
> vehicles into a bonnet wearing version? :-)
Well, the California Air Resources Board has a thing or two or fifty to
say about that. It's very expensive to swap an engine in CA, because
the vehicle has to be badged as being smogged as the source of the
engine.
I can, however, put an engine that's stroked to 5.0l under the heads and
(more importantly for the visual inspection during smog check) plenum
that says "3.9" :-). The tranny is actually pretty good. It's noisy,
but it's bulletproof. It turns out that off-roading in low range puts a
lot of stress on the vehicle, and it's built to withstand it. For
example, it comes with 4.11 diffs, and you wouldn't believe the size of
the CV joints up front.
C
> bobb
>
> "Christopher H. Dow" wrote:
>
> > I like your thinking, but the wheel base of my vehicle is already 1"
> >
> > longer than that one!
> >
> > here's a link to some pics of it:
> >
> > http://www.thelen.org/LandRover.html
> > http://www.thelen.org/airstream/astow.jpg (I just picked up a
> > lower-drop shank for the ball mount!).
> >
> > C
> >
> > bob basques wrote:
> > >
> > > You could trade in the Land Rover that you have on a nice Long
> > > Wheelbase model, maybe something like this:
> > >
> > > http://www.olive-drab.com/idphoto/id_photos_land_rover.php3
> > >
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > bobb
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Randy Unter wrote:
> > >
> > > > I agree with Harvey; park the Land Rover, buy a good used full
> > size
> > > > pickup ( or new if your budget allows), preferrably a 3/4 ton
> > with
> > > > at least a 3.73 axle, and you will:
> > > > 1. have a safer vehicle that will handle the load with better
> > > > control on the highway, especially under the dreaded push-pull
> > > > scenarios when wressling with passing semis.
> > > > 2. Save on the wear and tear on your expensive L-R.
> > Chevy-Ford-Dodge
> > > > P/U's are cheap to repair compared to L-R.
> > > > 3. Get better fuel economy with the biggest engine P/U. For
> > example
> > > > I tow a 26' Overlander with either a 99 Dodge Durango with 5.9
> > ltr
> > > > V8, 3.92 axle ratio or a '97 Chevy 2500, 7.4 Ltr V8 with 3.73
> > axle
> > > > ratio. Both tow well, but the big Chevy does so with complete
> > > > control and the same fuel mileage.
> > > > I tow in Colorado's mountains with long, steep grades. Both
> > handle
> > > > the load well, but on last Fall's trip to Olema, CA rally, I had
> > to
> > > > cross So. Wyoming on I-80 with a 50 mph frontal cross wind and
> > major
> > > > truck traffic. I was towing with the shorter Durango, but was
> > > > constantly push-pulled by trucks across the entire state. I
> > wished I
> > > > had driven the Chevy, but made it with some effort when all the
> > > > other 'square sided' RV's were pulled over (Thanks to a/s'
> > slippery
> > > > shape). My Durango's MPG dropped to 8 MPG, when 10-11 is normal
> > > > towing. The Chevy would have delivered probably 9-10 mpg, with
> > 11
> > > > normal towing.
> > > > So, save your L-R, and go with an American Made P/Up. Just so
> > you
> > > > don't think I'm anti import, my regular car is a Volvo, which I
> > > > love. But when I tow, I want reliable American steel and muscle
> > > > under my seat.
> > > > Randy Unter
> > > > '66 Overlander
> > > > Denver
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe or to change to a daily Digest, please go to
> > > > http://www.airstream.net/vaclist/listoffice.html
> > > >
> > > > If replying back to this message, please delete all the
> > unnecessary
> > > > original
> > > > text from your reply.
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > To unsubscribe or to change to a daily Digest, please go to
> > http://www.airstream.net/vaclist/listoffice.html
> >
> > If replying back to this message, please delete all the unnecessary
> > original
> > text from your reply.
> >
> >
To unsubscribe or to change to a daily Digest, please go to
http://www.airstream.net/vaclist/listoffice.html
If replying back to this message, please delete all the unnecessary original
text from your reply.
