no apology needed - i did not read that much into it.

i like that this forum is a place where people can speak
their minds about Airstream related issues - all opinions
accepted of course. i guess i was just standing up for our
project.  i like your keen observations.

as far as the masses thing - i am referring to factory production
as compared to one-offs.  one-offs with huge price tags defete
"production" ideas.  that was what my dumb comment was
referring to - maybe we should forget production ideas and
do several high priced versions for a chosen few.  ?????
naaaaah - i still want to pursue production. i would much rather
see 10, 50, or 500 trailers offered to people at a resonable
production price - as opposed to 4 with through the roof prices.
i view the Airstream as a unique design object made in a factory
for the masses - in some shape or form.

take care, i.d.

----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Multiple recipients of VACList <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 5:31 PM
Subject: [VAC] Genuine Ralph Lauren designed Airstreams MEA CULPA


> Inside Design,
> I do take responsibility for my words.  In my view, the Wilsonart
> trailer was clean and avoided the sad fate of "cute-ing up" and "dumbing
> down" of most contemporary design, but I found it way heavy on the
> laminates and not enough contrast of textures and materials. It was a
> breath of fresh air and helped turn the tide of trailer design toward
> younger and more sophisticated buyers. It is unfortunate that I've never
> yet had the chance to get inside and see the flow for myself.  It;
> however, seems colder than the utility/surplus model I'm talking about.
> Design is put out there and made to be compared.  You aren't dumb, and I
> make the point of the funds lavished on these follies.  As for
> "elitist", they are showcase examples like the Wilsonart trailer and I'm
> willing to bet I could produce something as nice with a reasonable
> budget.  They are charity write offs and much of the cost is in
> appointments and accessories that no other trailer comes with. I
> certainly was an oaf to slam your trailer design and could have made my
> point without comparing with "way cooler".  That's why I'm apologizing
> on net instead of off.  The Airstream was never really meant for the
> masses.  It is something of an elitist object, in itself.  The prices at
> the time were pretty high.  They had great fabrics and appliances and
> were made way better than the mass market trailers of the time.  That's
> why the recent Safari and Bambi models have gotten knocked by list
> members, they had cheap looking laminates and trim.  And, Inside Design,
> I repeat.....
> "for the same amount of money, you can make an ugly trailer or a
> beautiful one"  You did a fine job, I thing the "utility/surplus" (what
> does THAT mean, anyway?) trailer takes interiors a step further in the
> direction I'd like to see them go.  Note my slam of the other three
> where nothing exceeds like excess!  And I'm only a set designer anyhow.
> When I do remodel an empty sixties model or an empty (I wish) 2002
> bambi, I welcome your criticism.
> Tom Walden
>
> inside design wrote:
> >
> > "way cooler than the Wilsonart trailer"  ouch !!!
> >
> > i think the key words in your observation are-
> > "very free with the funds"
> >
> > these are the kind of "elitist" design solutions that
> > we try to avoid.  yes - you might like the designs.
> > but - are you going to pay 150,000 for one of these
> > trailers ??  and at this point - it looks like only four
> > people will have the chance to do so.  the
> > Wilsonart trailer is only one version of MANY
> > new design ideas that have been generated over
> > the past two years through Inside Design.  these
> > new ideas are meant to be for the masses.
> >
> > so - what does one do with new design ideas ?
> > try to get them to the masses ?
> > or create a "limited" number and sell them to a selected few ?
> >
> > we are still gonna fight to create a product that is available to
> > the masses - maybe we are the dumb ones.
> >
> > take care, inside design
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Multiple recipients of VACList <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 11:58 PM
> > Subject: [VAC] Re: Genuine Ralph Lauren designed Airstreams
> >
> > > I'm not sure what problem this posting made for Joy, but I was pleased
> > > as hell to get the pictures and the connection.  Perhaps my computer
or
> > > browser was more able to handle the way the information was presented
> > > and the listing of the underlined address would have been a better way
> > > of sending the information.
> > > I'm sure solution to the problem with the submission will be another
> > > lesson for us all in how we present something to the list so it don't
> > > scramble our friends programs.
> > >
> > >  I hate it when something screws up my computer or corrupts my
browser,
> > > and I am in sympathy with Joy's predicament; but I am excited by the
> > > "utility/surplus" airstream shown -- it is closer to what I've been
> > > thinking Airstream should be making today than the "dumb down to the
> > > lowest bland denominator of taste" designs they've been putting out
> > > lately. This is what I've been preaching made manifest in stainless,
> > > aluminum, wood and laminates.  Should be able to replicate those
designs
> > > at normal airstream prices.  Really want to step inside and check them
> > > out for myself, in person.
> > >
> > >  I'm not easily impressed, by other designer's work. These are way
> > > cooler than the all formica version for Wilsonart. (I understand the
use
> > > of the sponsor's product understandably heavily informed that design,
> > > and I'm not knocking it). Am pretty sure Ralph Lauren was also very
free
> > > with the funds for this project.
> > >
> > > Tom Walden
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe or to change to a daily Digest, please go to
> http://www.airstream.net/vaclist/listoffice.html
>
> If replying back to this message, please delete all the unnecessary
original
> text from your reply.
>
>




To unsubscribe or to change to a daily Digest, please go to
http://www.airstream.net/vaclist/listoffice.html

If replying back to this message, please delete all the unnecessary original
text from your reply.

 

Reply via email to