Even after manually gem installing chef, the gem pruning still fails on
json. I also tried adding an earlier version of json too. Why json? Why
Windows only? This really seems like a core vagrant bug at this point. Is
there any help or do I need to have the developer replaced? That's easier
than backing Vagrant out of our project at this point.


On 4 February 2014 12:19, Rhys Gareth <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've confirmed via a second windows box that Vagrant can't load the plugin
> vagrant-librarian-chef. Even with a clean install, both chef and chef-zero
> fail to locate dependency json. Yet running $
> GEM_HOME=/c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/gems gem list results in json
> being found in the list. Is there any way I can manually install/force
> json, or skip this dependency pruning? This works fine on linux and OSX so
> no idea why it's a "windows thing".
>
> Thanks,
> Rhys
>
>
>
> On 3 February 2014 23:54, Rhys Gareth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mitchell,
>>
>> I got the developer to uninstall vagrant, reinstall, then run the plugin
>> install again with debugging enabled. I've attached the full log but the
>> key error is here:
>>  DEBUG prune: Searching for: 'json'
>> ERROR prune: Missing dependency for 'chef-zero': json
>>
>> This looks to be from an area of code you deleted in a pull request about
>> a month ago - is that the next version you are talking about? Unfortunately
>> I need this developer starting "yesterday" or else need to find a
>> contractor with the right OS (exactly what I was hoping to avoid with
>> Vagrant!)
>>
>> What's strange to me is that "gem query --local" shows JSON: json (1.5.5)
>>
>> Looking at chef's gemspec (
>> https://github.com/opscode/chef/blob/master/chef.gemspec), this falls
>> within their allowable range:
>>
>>   s.add_dependency "json", ">= 1.4.4", "<=  1.8.1"
>>
>> Also in the vagrant debug though, I see this suspicious output:
>>  WARN environment: No local data path is set. Local data cannot be stored.
>> DEBUG environment: Loading plugins from:
>> C:/Users/KurDt/.vagrant.d/plugins.json
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rhys
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3 February 2014 22:31, Mitchell Hashimoto <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Rhys,
>>>
>>> It looks like there might be gem conflicts. I'm sorry about that.
>>> Unfortunately your error message doesn't say exactly what... oddly. This
>>> sort of thing never will happen in the next version of Vagrant because we
>>> check for conflicts at install-time.
>>>
>>> There must be more to that error message somewhere in the log.
>>>
>>> best,
>>> Mitchell
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Rhys Gareth <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I went with option 1 of the below and we now have the RC candidate of
>>>> chef loaded and presumably in use. However we have a strange problem that
>>>> vagrant says the plugin is installed yet then fails to load it during
>>>> vagrant up. The relevant section is here:
>>>>
>>>> ERROR root: Failed to load plugin: vagrant-librarian-chef
>>>> ERROR root: -- Error: #
>>>> ERROR root: -- Backtrace:
>>>> ERROR root:
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:2007:in
>>>> raise_if_conflicts'
>>>>
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1176:inactivate'
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1212:in
>>>> block in activate_dependencies'
>>>>
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1198:ineach'
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1198:in
>>>> activate_dependencies'
>>>>
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1180:inactivate'
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1212:in
>>>> block in activate_dependencies'
>>>>
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1198:ineach'
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1198:in
>>>> activate_dependencies'
>>>>
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1180:inactivate'
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems.rb:186:in rescue
>>>> in try_activate'
>>>>
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems.rb:183:intry_activate'
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:117:in
>>>> rescue in require'
>>>>
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:124:inrequire'
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/gems/gems/vagrant-1.4.3/lib/vagrant.rb:204:in
>>>> require_plugin'
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/gems/gems/vagrant-1.4.3/lib/vagrant/environment.rb:760:inblock
>>>> in load_plugins'
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/gems/gems/vagrant-1.4.3/lib/vagrant/environment.rb:751:in
>>>> each'
>>>>
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/gems/gems/vagrant-1.4.3/lib/vagrant/environment.rb:751:inload_plugins'
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/gems/gems/vagrant-1.4.3/lib/vagrant/environment.rb:132:in
>>>> initialize'
>>>>
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/gems/gems/vagrant-1.4.3/bin/vagrant:105:innew'
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/embedded/gems/gems/vagrant-1.4.3/bin/vagrant:105:in
>>>> <top (required)>'
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/bin/../embedded/gems/bin/vagrant:23:inload'
>>>> c:/HashiCorp/Vagrant/bin/../embedded/gems/bin/vagrant:23:in `'
>>>> INFO interface: error: Failed to load the "vagrant-librarian-chef"
>>>> plugin. View logs for more details.
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, February 3, 2014 1:05:51 PM UTC+1, Rhys Gareth wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Mitchell, thank you!  Sorry, I'm not familiar with ruby/gems, so this
>>>>> has required some learning. I hope I can solve it in the next step/answer
>>>>> from you:
>>>>>
>>>>> vagrant-librarian-chef depends up librarian-chef, which depends on
>>>>> chef, which has the ffi dependency problem. This has just been fixed in a
>>>>> release candidate version of Chef, now referenced on rubygems.org (
>>>>> http://rubygems.org/gems/chef)
>>>>>
>>>>> What is the best/cleanest way to uninstall/reinstall to get this fix?
>>>>> I am guessing there are two alternatives:
>>>>> 1. Manually install the RC gem version of chef first, then run
>>>>> "vagrant plugin install vagrant-librarian-chef" and librarian-chef should
>>>>> use whatever chef version I have cached, i.e. the latest RC one.
>>>>> 2. Manually edit the .gemspec of librarian.chef to add dependency for
>>>>> the RC version of Chef, and let it automatically download that locally
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks again,
>>>>> Rhys
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, February 3, 2014 11:54:24 AM UTC+1, Mitchell Hashimoto
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rhys,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since this is a bug with the gemspec of the plugin, you'd have to
>>>>>> actually go into the "~.vagrant.d/gems/gems" folder, find the gem that
>>>>>> depends on the wrong FFI version, and change it in that gemspec itself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Mitchell
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Rhys Gareth <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We have a Vagrant-based project which is working fine on OS X and
>>>>>>> Linux but failing on Windows. The culprit is the vagrant-librarian-chef
>>>>>>> plugin. It installs without error, but causes "vagrant up" to fail:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  INFO environment: Loading plugin from JSON: vagrant-librarian-chef
>>>>>>> ERROR root: Failed to load plugin: vagrant-librarian-chef
>>>>>>> ERROR root:  -- Error: #<Gem::LoadError: Unable to activate
>>>>>>> chef-11.8.2-x86-ming
>>>>>>> w32, because ffi-1.9.3-x86-mingw32 conflicts with ffi (= 1.3.1)>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The root cause appears to have been fixed here:
>>>>>>> https://tickets.opscode.com/browse/CHEF-4913 but this has not
>>>>>>> flowed through to the Vagrant plugin.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd try to patch this locally myself but I'm confused by how the
>>>>>>> vagrant plugin namespace works and how I would do this? e.g. could I 
>>>>>>> fork
>>>>>>> the plugin, update it, build it and copy it to a local path for vagrant
>>>>>>> plugin install to use, rather than it pulling the old/unworking version
>>>>>>> from the web?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rhys
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Vagrant" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Vagrant" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups "Vagrant" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/vagrant-up/8rlraE3r-1I/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Vagrant" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to