Im in the same position.
Anyone got this working?
On Tuesday, September 10, 2013 9:57:14 PM UTC-4, Luis Lavena wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I found myself in the need to replicate the following network interface
> setup:
>
> eth0: dhcp interface connected "to the internetz" (IPv4)
> eth1: dhcp interface connected to the DC routing.
>
> Until today, I was a happy person using "private_network" and setting it
> to a particular IP, leaving the eth0 as NAT and used to download stuff from
> the web.
>
> Now, I need to ensure eth0 is public interface so other machines can
> connect to the ports of it and eth1 be an internal network for multiple VMs
> on the same machine to interact (cluster).
>
> I've tried adding the "public_network" and indicate the bridge in my
> Vagrantfile:
>
> Vagrant.configure("2") do |config|
> config.vm.box = "precise64"
>
> # boxes
> config.vm.define "box1" do |box|
> # setup two interfaces
> box.vm.network "public_network", bridge: "en0: Wi-Fi (AirPort)"
> box.vm.network "private_network", ip: "192.168.33.100"
> end
> end
>
> But seems that the one defined as public ends being eth1 and the private
> being eth2.
>
> While I know particular provider customization should be avoided, perhaps
> there is something I can do as provider block to remove the briged/NAT
> interface?
>
> All this were my noob observations, but most likely I'm missing something.
>
> Any suggestion?
>
> Thank you in advance.
> --
> Luis Lavena
> AREA 17
> -
> Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
> but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
> Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Vagrant" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
