Hi Alvaro, plain docker is fine for me.
We use vagrant with Virtual Box until now for our development.. so it would be cool to have provider Docker with multi private network supported (as provider Virtual Box). Just wonder if Mitchellh has this feature in his roadmap.. On Thursday, August 14, 2014 10:47:11 PM UTC+2, Alvaro Miranda Aguilera wrote: > > hello, > > without vagrant, just using plain docker > > can you do that? > > how? > > Alvaro > > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Tri Vo Hoang <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I wonder if provider docker currently supports the option >> "private_network", whereby an interface of the container is created and >> connected to a bridge of the same network range on the host? >> >> config.vm.network "private_network", ip: "192.168.0.11" >> config.vm.provider "docker" do |d| >> ... >> >> If not, do you know in which vagrant version will be supported? >> >> Thank you, >> Tri >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Vagrant" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vagrant" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
