You might want to try packer: http://www.packer.io/ for the vanilla box and then layer the rest of the provisioning with vagrant.
If that doesn't jive, I'd be happy to brainstorm more ideas :) On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 3:52:22 PM UTC-4, Tennis Smith wrote: > > > Hi, > > There is a point in the "vagrant up" process that is exactly what I would > like to keep as a vanilla box for future tests. > > Can "vagrant package" be called inside of a Vagrantfile? Bad idea? > > -T > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vagrant" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
