have you tried vmware-fusion? i found it faster than parallels, especially with nested virtualization. now you got me curious if this would translate to better battery performance.
there are also a couple vagrant xhyve ports, and an article about them. https://medium.com/@fiercelysw/virtualization-on-mac-os-x-using-vagrant-part-1-be0f0e291938?source=---------0-------------- https://github.com/oldpatricka/vagrant-xhyve can use dockers https://github.com/moby/hyperkit which probably has better battery life since its made to be lighter. On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 4:01:41 AM UTC-7, Miguel Nunes wrote: > > I've been "out" of Linux and VMs for a while but noticed that Clear Linux > is beating most other distros on performance benchmarks. > > Is there a reason there's no vagrant box for Clear Linux? > > I am trying to find the best solution for my MacBook so I can have a > Vagrant VM for development that doesn't drain the battery too fast. Some > time ago I switched from VirtualBox to Parallels and it made a huge > difference. Is there something better than Parallels in terms of > performance (battery consumption)? > -- This mailing list is governed under the HashiCorp Community Guidelines - https://www.hashicorp.com/community-guidelines.html. Behavior in violation of those guidelines may result in your removal from this mailing list. GitHub Issues: https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/issues IRC: #vagrant on Freenode --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vagrant" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vagrant-up/e8146f07-eaf5-41b2-91a8-32cfd3275667%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
