Like some kind of opt-in DNS network (hosting-wise)? Almost P2P style? Or some 
kind of DNS darknet?

-Nick

---
Nicholas Floersch (pr. Floor-sh)
Stone Environmental, Inc. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vermont Area Group of Unix Enthusiasts
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jacob Torrey
> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 11:06 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Anyone seeing sites blocked/unavailable over Comcast?
> 
> I would start at the open source institute at Clarkson (In upstate NY).
> Though I'm going to be releasing the system soon (all FOSS) so anyone
> could host it. I might setup a few EC2 machines, but we shall see.
> 
> Jacob
> 
> Nick Floersch wrote:
> > Hosted locally, nationally, or farther abroad?
> >
> > ---
> > Nicholas Floersch (pr. Floor-sh)
> > Stone Environmental, Inc.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Vermont Area Group of Unix Enthusiasts
> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jacob Torrey
> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 10:57 AM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: Anyone seeing sites blocked/unavailable over Comcast?
> >>
> >> I hopefully will soon be launching my own distributed, caching,
> >> recursive DNS cluster. Once it's up I will shoot the list a few IPs.
> >>
> >> Jacob
> >>
> >> Nick Floersch wrote:
> >>
> >>> <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math";
> >>>
> >> panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri;
> >> panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Tahoma;
> >> panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal,
> >> li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt;
> >> font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";} a:link,
> >> span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue;
> >> text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
> >> {mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;}
> >> span.EmailStyle17 {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
> >> font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;} .MsoChpDefault
> >> {mso-style-type:export-only;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in;
> >> margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->
> >>
> >>> Although it does not sound like your problem is DNS related, I just
> >>>
> >> wanted to vouch for switching over to OpenDNS’ DNS servers if you
> are
> >> experiencing strange issues with DNS. I am on CloudAlliance which I
> >> believe feeds off of Powershift, and I was having particular trouble
> >> reaching Newegg. Even sometimes it seemed to resolve properly but
> still
> >> never got there. I switched to using OpenDNS at home, overriding the
> >> PPPOE settings I am given, and Newegg started showing up flawlessly.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I will say also that although it still does not sound like DNS is
> >>>
> >> your
> >> problem, it is possible to properly resolve the most-public facing
> IP
> >> of
> >> a web site only to have bad DNS muck you up when that website tries
> to
> >> redirect to some other dependant website. Case in point,
> >> “secure.newegg.com” might be messed up in your DNS resolution phase
> >> even
> >> if www.newegg.com <http://www.newegg.com> is not, and then you would
> be
> >> able to get to the main website at Newegg, but not login. Unlikely,
> but
> >> possible.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> If you can’t even get to the main page at Slashdot, though, that’s
> >>>
> >> pretty different. I just thought I would write about OpenDNS to
> suggest
> >> it for those listening who haven’t considered the _/free/_ service.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> -Nick
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> Nicholas Floersch (pr. Floor-sh)
> >>> Stone Environmental, Inc.
> >>>
> >>> *From:* Vermont Area Group of Unix Enthusiasts
> >>>
> >> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Stanley Brinkerhoff
> >>
> >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 24, 2008 10:39 AM
> >>> *To:* [email protected]
> >>> *Subject:* Re: Anyone seeing sites blocked/unavailable over
> Comcast?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Tracing route to slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org> [216.34.181.45]
> >>> over a maximum of 30 hops:
> >>>
> >>>   1     1 ms     1 ms     3 ms  OPEN-WRT [192.168.1.1]
> >>>   2    17 ms     7 ms     7 ms  73.195.24.1
> >>>   3     8 ms     7 ms    11 ms
> >>>
> >> ge-1-38-ur01.berlin.vt.boston.comcast.net
> >> <http://ge-1-38-ur01.berlin.vt.boston.comcast.net> [68.86
> >>
> >>> .236.129]
> >>>   4     9 ms    17 ms     7 ms
> >>>
> >> te-8-1-ur01.lebanon.nh.boston.comcast.net
> >> <http://te-8-1-ur01.lebanon.nh.boston.comcast.net> [68.87
> >>
> >>> .146.213]
> >>>   5     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms
> >>>
> >> te-9-1-ur01.claremont.nh.boston.comcast.net
> >> <http://te-9-1-ur01.claremont.nh.boston.comcast.net> [68.
> >>
> >>> 87.146.209]
> >>>   6    83 ms    15 ms    10 ms
> >>>
> >> te-8-1-ur01.putney.vt.boston.comcast.net
> >> <http://te-8-1-ur01.putney.vt.boston.comcast.net> [68.87.
> >>
> >>> 146.205]
> >>>   7    11 ms    11 ms    14 ms
> >>>
> >> te-9-1-ur01.hinsdale.nh.boston.comcast.net
> >> <http://te-9-1-ur01.hinsdale.nh.boston.comcast.net> [68.8
> >>
> >>> 7.146.201]
> >>>   8    13 ms    16 ms    13 ms
> >>>
> >> te-8-2-ar01.needham.ma.boston.comcast.net
> >> <http://te-8-2-ar01.needham.ma.boston.comcast.net> [68.87
> >>
> >>> .146.198]
> >>>   9    17 ms    15 ms    15 ms  68.85.162.74
> >>>  10    21 ms    19 ms    19 ms
> >>>
> >> te-0-4-0-1-cr01.newyork.ny.ibone.comcast.net
> >> <http://te-0-4-0-1-cr01.newyork.ny.ibone.comcast.net> [68
> >>
> >>> .86.90.61]
> >>>  11    23 ms    22 ms    21 ms
> >>>
> >> pos-1-9-0-0-cr01.newyork.ny.ibone.comcast.net
> >> <http://pos-1-9-0-0-cr01.newyork.ny.ibone.comcast.net> [6
> >>
> >>> 8.86.86.46]
> >>>  12    20 ms    20 ms    22 ms  208.173.138.13
> >>>  13    21 ms    21 ms    21 ms  cr2-tengig-0-15-4-
> >>>
> >> 0.NewYork.savvis.net
> >> <http://cr2-tengig-0-15-4-0.NewYork.savvis.net> [204.70.1
> >>
> >>> 98.17]
> >>>  14    46 ms    45 ms    46 ms  cr2-pos-0-7-3-0.chicago.savvis.net
> >>>
> >> <http://cr2-pos-0-7-3-0.chicago.savvis.net> [204.70.192.1
> >>
> >>> 09]
> >>>  15    46 ms    46 ms    46 ms
> >>>
> >> hr2-tengigabitethernet-12-1.elkgrovech3.savvis.n
> >>
> >>> et [204.70.195.122]
> >>>  16    47 ms    49 ms    47 ms  csr1-ve241.elkgrovech3.savvis.net
> >>>
> >> <http://csr1-ve241.elkgrovech3.savvis.net> [216.64.194.42
> >>
> >>> ]
> >>>  17    56 ms    53 ms    53 ms  64.27.160.194
> >>>  18    46 ms    45 ms    46 ms  slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org>
> >>>
> >> [216.34.181.45]
> >>
> >>> Stan
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Richard Lawrence
> <[email protected]
> >>>
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Well, that's the funny part -- I don't think I'm having DNS issues.
> >>>
> >> I
> >>
> >>> get the same IP back for slashdot (216.34.181.45) whether I use
> >>> Comcast's DNS, OpenDNS, or 4.2.2.2 for the server in nslookup.  I
> >>>
> >> just
> >>
> >>> don't seem to be able to get there via HTTP...even if I request
> >>>
> >> directly
> >>
> >>> to the IP.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks everyone for your quick responses...I am puzzled indeed.
> >>>
> >>> Richard
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Stanley Brinkerhoff wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> No problems here (Comcast, Montpelier) -- but if you are having
> DNS
> >>>> issues, try adding 4.2.2.2 as a DNS server.
> >>>>
> >>>> Stan
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Kevin Thorley
> >>>>
> >> <[email protected]
> >>
> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> / This communication, including any attachments, is solely for the
> >> confidential use of the person(s) named above. If you have received
> >> this
> >> communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and
> >> delete/destroy the original. Any reader other than the intended
> >> recipient is hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
> >> distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. /
> >>
> >
> > This communication, including any attachments, is solely for the
> confidential use of the person(s) named above. If you have received
> this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and
> delete/destroy the original. Any reader other than the intended
> recipient is hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
> >

This communication, including any attachments, is solely for the confidential 
use of the person(s) named above. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete/destroy the original. 
Any reader other than the intended recipient is hereby notified that any 
review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly 
prohibited.

Reply via email to