On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 09:49 -0400, Rubin Bennett wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 09:34 -0400, Jacob Beauregard wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 20:57 -0400, David wrote: > > > Seemed quite detailed here, maybe it was VAGUE due to the lack of $$$ > > > #'s? =/ > > > > > I was actually referring to "very cool web application". > > > What, that's not specific enough to run up a proposal on? Jeez, man, > what do you want from me?! Well, not so much for me personally. I apologize if it was taken the wrong way.
> > > > I'm sure that it is something that Rubin does not want to get down > > > into the nitty gritty details without trust of who he is talking to. > > > This list IS open to the public, I am only speculating, though. > > Dave's exactly right. > > > Yea, in reading the email though, I thought it would at least give a > > hint as to why this web application was very cool. > > > It's cool because I think it's cool. And if I think it's cool, it's > cool (kidding, I'm really not that hung up on myself). > > Kidding aside, it's cool because it's an application that will > essentially run a start-up that has the very real potential to get HUGE > in the very near future. :) > > The truth is that the application is mostly an idea at this point - no > storyboards, no database design done, etc. yet. So details are lacking > because they don't exist yet. > Interesting > Rubin > > > > -- > > > There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand > > > binary and those who do not. > > > --- > > > David McClellan > > >
