But P4 1.5 < PIII 1.5 < P4 2.5 Or something like that. I remember seeing a graph advertising the P4 which was remarkably stupid in showing that a 1.8 P4 was 10% faster than a 1.5 PIII... something to that affect.
AJ ONeal (317) 426-6525 On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Stanley Brinkerhoff <[email protected]>wrote: > http://www.cpubenchmark.net/common_cpus.html > > That should do ya. But basically; P4 2.0ghz < p4 3.0ghz < P4D (the d is > dual core) < p4m (mobile) < core solo < core duo < quad core < i5 < i7 > > Celerons are related byh family to their brotherin. Pentium M's are in > laptops and outpace the P4's. Good luck ever trying to figure out how an > AMD Stacks up. I just refer to cpu benchmark, find its closest pentium, and > use that as a benchmark against other CPU's. > > Stan > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Bjorn Behrendt > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I am trying to simplify my life and figure out which older computers to >> use vs another. It use to be that I could just look at the processor >> speed and tell if it is better then another. Ram is still similar (the >> more the merrier) but the processors have gotten a bit confusing. >> >> Does anybody know of a chart online that has a summary list of the >> processors and the order if quality? >> >> >> Bjorn Behrendt >> IT Coordinator >> Mount St. Joseph >> [email protected] >> (802) 775-0151 >> > >
