HEY! THANKS!

by using chdir() it worked

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 4:10 PM, John Campbell <[email protected]>wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Eric Basile wrote:
>
>  I've only been on this list a short while (since about January) and have
>> never made a post until today since you guys may my best bet for help. For
>> my Linux/Unix class my teacher wants us to do a simple rewrite of ls (mine
>> I'm calling els since my name is Eric). So far everything is working
>> correctly except when i try to use it giving it two command line arguments
>> (ex".$:./els -l ~") instead of giving a detailed list of my home directory
>> it gives a shorter detailed list of current directory and I'm not sure
>> why.
>>
>
>        I know why. But in interest of not doing your homework for you, I'll
> just start you off with a recommendation that should help you figure it out
> yourself:
>
>        Fail noisily and informatively. Several of the standard functions
> you're using set errno when they fail. Checking their return value is a
> start, but don't just report a generic "Error", and *especially* don't just
> skip silently to the next loop iteration without reporting *anything*. When
> you get a bad return value, announce it loudly, and *call perror()*. Let
> the
> program tell you what's actually failing, and *why*. This gives you
> something to work with when debugging.
>
>        Once you're armed with that information, here's a second hint:
> readdir() returns a bare filename, not a full path.
>
>        And on an unrelated note, I don't recommend omitting the braces
> around single-statement code blocks, even though you technically can. It's
> easy to create non-obvious bugs by forgetting to add them if you expand the
> code block.
>
>
> - -- John Campbell
> [email protected]
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkyWbj8ACgkQPu/PJk2ePZ1joACfZBy6Altj3UbZXXRdXH1M8x+7
> JbsAoLzB7D+/5cwVZyCzFJhUDIc6AH6G
> =m1+X
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



-- 
-Eric

Reply via email to