On 17/01/2008, Jürg Billeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jaap, > > On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 15:44 +0100, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote: > > I think it would be very helpful for potential contributors to have > > some high level documentation on how vala works internally > > E.g. class diagrams, a description explaining the directory structure, > > a description what happens when the vala compiler gets called etc. > > Yes, that would certainly make sense. However, I think that the language > documentation is a lot more important right now, although there have > been some improvements in that area, e.g. with the tutorial in the Wiki. > > The generated libvala documentation[1] might help a bit, although the > actual method descriptions are not available in the HTML yet. Reading > vala/compiler/valacompiler.vala (the entry point of valac) should help > quite a bit in understanding how the compiler works internally.
Whether language docs or technical docs are more important is really about which parties you are wanting to attract. If the language docs are better more users a likely to stick with Vala after they've satisfied their initial curiosity. Same pattern applies to technically advanced users and technical docs. I think Vala has enough traction to not need lots more end user docs (but more technical docs), but you are really the only one qualified to answer that. Cheers, Mikkel _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
