On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 03:03 +0200, Hans Vercammen wrote: > Thanks again for clearing things up. > > > For cases where this is a performance issue, we're improving the support > > for non-GObject (but still GType-registered) classes, which follow more > > closely the C# and Java construction scheme. > > Will the non-gobject approach in the future provide oo paradigms which > are not limited to the gobject likings or should I see this differently?
Non-GObject classes can't use the GObject property or construction mechanism, therefere we use a simple system for constructors and this will be pretty similar to what C# and Java does, except that we don't use overloading. Constructor chaining is not supported yet but the rest should already work. Jürg _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
