I fear I don't understand the second suggestion. Please could you provide a small example.
Thanks Sam -----Original Message----- From: gege2061 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 25 June 2008 18:39 To: Sam Liddicott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: gtk widget bindings complete > After analyzing the generated code, I have some proposals : > * Use abstract class, > > > you're probably right. It's just sugar, but sugar is important. Of course, it's just a proposal, for v2... > * Create abstrat method for signal, > > > I considered this. I'm not certain of the benefits. > There are lots of signals, most of which exist of exist for each widget. > > Often there is a different signal handler for the same signal for different > widgets. > > So what would these abstract methods be? Dispatchers? Based on what info? > > Only the developer knows what signals he wants to catch and how, so I left > these to be done in the subclass, but at least the developer only has to get > the name right and the rest happens automatically. Sorry I wanted to say : signal callback, defined in XML, to force developers to implement it in sub-classe (hence my first proposal). > * Use verbatim string for XML (see my example). > > > I don't like this because the xml may actually contain """ and there is no > way to escape it. > I did have it set to close the string on \n and start a new line and open > the string again, but vala doesn't support const string concatenation yet _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
