On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 10:20 +0300, Arto Karppinen wrote: > > > > Why not do it sh(1) style? (continue 2, break 2). > > > > I would say that the perl style is a lot clearer about what happens. > > If you have a lot of loops inside one another, it needs some figuring > out which loops happens to be number 2 at any given point.
I agree that the Perl style is clearer, however, I currently don't intend to add either to Vala, as both will make the code harder to read, and I don't see sufficient need for this functionality. If you have complex nested loops you might want to consider using helper methods, this usually makes the code a lot clearer. Jürg _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
