On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 07:45 +0100, Hans Vercammen wrote: > On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 05:23 +0100, Hans Vercammen wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 22:05 -0500, Yu Feng wrote: > > > Machines can be happy if the ccode are written carefully, but a > > > bilingual text is usually difficult for human beings to understand; to > > > me this is more convincable than any other arguments against inline C. > > > > I don't really understand this one, could you explain? > > A bit early on this Sunday morning, but I think I understand what you > are trying to say. I guess it depends on the developer background a bit. > I've worked with languages that embed active SQL, which have proven to > be quite useful. Using assembler code might just feel as natural to > others.
Useful <> understandable. ccode in vala can also be quite useful but it will make the program a riddle. > > Hans > _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list Vala-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
