On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 14:50 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 19:32 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
> > I made a patch to accept the following syntax:
> >
> > class Container<T> {
> > ...
> > }
> > class Stuff: Container<Widget> {
> > Stuff() {
> > base<Widget>();
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Bug #567319
>
> Thanks for the patch. I don't think it's a good idea to require the
> developer to specify the type argument again when chaining up. It should
> not be allowed to specify a differing type argument, so we should just
> drop the requirement to specify it, in my opinion.
>
Yes. The problem is I don't know where to look up those argument_lists;
would you take a look into it?
Yu
> Jürg
>
_______________________________________________
Vala-list mailing list
Vala-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
