On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 00:47 +0200, Vlad Grecescu wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Yu Feng <[email protected]> > wrote: > Hi, > > I am curious but are there any reasons to avoid static > abstract member > functions? They seem to be pretty doable because the class > structure is > instance-independent. > > Regards, > > Yu > > Doesn't 'abstract' implies > not-implemented-here-please-rely-on-Polymorphism? > > I suppose this has yet to be done without instances . > GObject->constructor is similar to this. It is virtual and static.
> -- > Vlad _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
