Hi,
I've tried to port some Gtkmm example to vala and after I changed the vapi
it works (see attachment).
May be its wrong.

Thanks for response.
I will think about it.

Regards
Uwe


2009/5/29 Frederik <[email protected]>

> Uwe Strempel wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've found another one in gtk+-2.0.vapi.
> > class Container
> > following is wrong
> >    public virtual void forall (Gtk.Callback callback, void*
> callback_data);
> >
> > should be
> >     public virtual void forall (bool include_internals, Gtk.Callback
> > callback);
>
> Hi Uwe,
>
> there was a bug regarding this issue:
>
>  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=543872
>
> You can use now:
>
>  forall_internal (bool include_internals, Gtk.Callback callback);
>
> >     In class Widget.
> >     I' think
> >     size_allocate is wrong
> >     before:
> >
> >     public virtual signal void size_allocate (Gtk.Allocation
>  allocation);
> >
> >     after change:
> >     public virtual signal void size_allocate (ref Gtk.Allocation
> >     allocation);
> >
> >     I don't know if signal works with ref, but the vala compiler creates
> >     const GtkAllocation * instead GtkAllocation.
>
> The type is Gdk.Rectangle, not Gtk.Allocation - I'm not sure why.
> I don't think that 'allocation' should be a 'ref' argument. In contrast
> to 'requisition' in 'size_request()' it is not meant to be changed by
> the method. GTK+ doesn't consequently use const struct pointers for
> arguments where it actually should do. The Vala way is better but it
> produces a "discards qualifiers from pointer target type" gcc warning
> when overriding this method.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Frederik
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vala-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
>

Attachment: ExampleWindow.vala
Description: Binary data

Attachment: MyContainer.vala
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list

Reply via email to