While don't you write an example of what your proposal would look like to the list? I honestly don't understand how your proposed solution would work for non-gobject bindings.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Sam Liddicott <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, but it is much cleaner and nicer to express it as an interface than a > bunch of ccode attributes. > > And not all structs of the same type are allocated by the same subsystem or > want freeing with the same free function. >
_______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
