It's a cute thought. But then you would try to debug a segfault or memory corruption on a production site.
-- Christian On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Michael B. Trausch<[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Jeremy wrote: >>> >>> Maybe mod_mono (for apache) is an example of the sort of dependency I >>> was thinking of: >>> http://ibbie.xanga.com/686874553/item/ >> >> That would be my blog post. I do still think a "mod_vala" would be a >> *great* idea. Unfortunately, I feel it best to suggest that focusing on >> improving the documentation might be a better goal. Both flavors of >> syntax are great; but anyone coming in, either knowing another language >> or just new to programming, will be discouraged when they can't find the >> answers. After all, it's really difficult to RTFM when there's no >> (finished) FM. I mean, imagine if you did "man sbrk", and at "RETURN >> VALUE" it just said "To be completed..." (; > > Hrm. A "mod_vala" might be okay, but it would be necessarily non-portable. > Why not have a FastCGI library for GObject instead, and then Vala (or C) can > be used to create applications that use the FastCGI protocol run run behind > a Web server? > > The FastCGI library could be a bare, low-level thing that just implemented > the protocol, and have a layer that sat on top of it to provide more > reasonable interface to the proess and make it easy to work with. That > would accomplish something along the lines of a mod_vala, but it would not > only work with Apache, but a fair lot of other Web servers, as well. > > --- Mike > _______________________________________________ > Vala-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list > _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
