On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:40:33 +0200, Jürg Billeter <[email protected]> wrote:
> This should be `yield return i;'. We do not use/need `yield return' > for async methods, and I'm planning to add support for `yield return' > for generators in Vala the same way as it's used in C#. I don't see a > conflict here. Can I ask what probably should be an obvious answer... Why is it 'yield return'. What else can 'yield' be followed by? I can't see a reference to documentation on the syntax and usage of 'yield' anywhere... But I'm guessing everyone else has? -- Fredderic Debian/unstable (LC#384816) on i686 2.6.30-1-686 2009 (up 8 days, 18:23)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
