Jan Hudec wrote: > I didn't notice that thing -- it's indeed good tool for the job. I would > still prefer something to mark in the source that we are synchronizing an > async function. Maybe a .sync() "submethod" to match .begin() and .end() and > state clearly what is happening:
.sync() is exactly what I proposed Jürg initially :p _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
