On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 22:32:48 +0200, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 09:23 +0200, Jan Hudec wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 22:21:36 +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > > Or would it be better to make the parser recognize asynchronous
> > > functions that don't end in _async?
> >
> > An async function can be recognized by having a GAsyncReadyCallback argument
> > next to last and void * last (that's what vala expects from an async
> > function). So it could probably be detected only by that (and not look at
> > "_async" suffix at all except to strip it).
>
> Unfortunately, there are a few exceptions to that. An attribute sounds
> safer for now.
Ability to override the automagic does make sense. But this rule should cover
more cases than the _async suffix one, no?
--
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
