Wolter Hellmund wrote:
>> I don't see the benefit of these forms versus
>>
>> struct Object {
>> int id;
>> float mass;
>> }
>>
>> respectively
>>
>> enum Process {
>> CONSTRUCT,
>> RUN,
>> DESTROY
>> }
>>
>> or did you miss that these are available?
>
> Oh, I totally missed that! I thought those were typedef kind of
> declarations,
They are type definitions. I don't think this is what you meant.
struct MyStruct {
// ...
}
...
MyStruct my_struct = ...
I think you wanted to define a variable of an anonymous struct/enum type
(i.e. without naming the type). This is possible with C and C++ but not
with Vala, Java and C#.
> Now, as to reply Frederick:
>
> Well, I think that
>
> foreach (MyEnum item in MyEnum.values) { ... }
>
> would tell the system that item is an enum itself, and to look for
> instances of it in MyEnum (thus to look for enums in an enum), am I
> wrong? If not, then I'll consider filing a bug with the following
> structure
>
> foreach (MyEnum.Item item in MyEnum) { ... }
The type of an enum value (item) is the enum type itself:
enum MyEnum {
A,
B
}
...
MyEnum item = MyEnum.A;
> Frederick: Also, good to have you back from Germany (someone tole me you
> were away) I am going to show you how my SDL thing turned out later.
You can send me an email.
Best regards,
Frederik
_______________________________________________
Vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
