Abderrahim Kitouni escribió:
> Hi,
>
> 2009/11/30 "Andrés G. Aragoneses" <[email protected]>:
>> Replying to myself:
>>
>> Andrés G. Aragoneses escribió:
>>> Hello. I'm wondering if the difference between Vala and C# wrt
>>> method/ctor overloading is intentional or is its real support planned in
> It's intentional, one of the main goals of vala is to have libraries
> that can be used from C. So methods must have sensible names (i.e.
> name mangling is not an option)
>
> btw, Vala has named creation methods (a.k.a. named constructors) so
> there is no need for overloading (Yes, it would be useful but not
> necessary)
Useful but not necessary, I agree. So this is why, if I were to help
providing a patch for this, I would make ctor overloading an option, not
dropping support for named constructors. Would that be acceptable?
Thanks,
Andres
--
_______________________________________________
Vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
