On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 08:21 +0100, pHilipp Zabel wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Jan-Jaap van der Geer > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 15:09 -0800, Evan Nemerson wrote: > >> On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 23:45 +0100, pHilipp Zabel wrote:
> >> > If errmess is null-terminated and utf-8 encoded, you could wrap it as > >> > a weak string. > > Why weak? > Because otherwise vala will try to call error_destroy () to have it > free the errmess string: [snip vala & generated c-code] Yes, I understand that it should not call error_destroy(), but my solution was to make it unowned, while you suggested making it weak. I would not be surprised if both work, I know unowned works. But what is preferred in this case? Cheers, Jan-Jaap ____________________________________________________________ Receive Notifications of Incoming Messages Easily monitor multiple email accounts & access them with a click. Visit http://www.inbox.com/notifier and check it out! _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
