On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:04:42 -0500, Jamie McCracken <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 20:50 +0100, Nicolas wrote: >> In fact, i'm using genie, because i love the syntax. >> I making all the available examples in >> http://code.valaide.org/category/tags/genie >> But the problem i encountering here, i can encounter it with other >> languages, because i don't know about the programming techniques. > In Genie we automatically determine the hash function to use based on > type (unlike vala which has to specify the hash function) I haven't really looked at genie... But I'm curious, where these differences come in, what exactly is genie's relationship to vala? I'd sort of assumed it was just an alternative source file parser with the same compiler back-end. For example, why can genie figure out the correct hash function in some cases, but vala can't? -- Fredderic Debian/unstable (LC#384816) on i686 2.6.30-1-686 2009 (up 10 days, 12:56)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
