Overloading could easily be supported with mandatory cname or csuffix attributes; that an explicit name needs to be given for C is no reason that it needs to be given for vala which could do regular overloading.
I think it ought to be supported. Sam -----Original Message----- From: Jiří Zárevúcky <[email protected]> Sent: 08 January 2010 15:25 To: Fabzter <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vala] Support for method overloading. Fabzter píše v Čt 07. 01. 2010 v 16:01 -0600: > Hi. I have been playing with Vala for some months. I find it to be a really > cool language, thus, I'm thinking in porting an medium sized personal > project from C# to Vala, but it relies heavyly on method and constructor > overloading, and having this features in Vala would make my refactoring work > minimal, so I want to know if vala will ever support this features, you > know, so I can start waiting if they are planned. :) Short story: No. Long story: Vala translates to C, which doesn't support overloading. That means any overloading in Vala would mean mangling names of methods in C, which would go against one of the most significant advantages of Vala - being able to use Vala library the same way as if it was written in C. The same goes for constructors, you just need to come up with some nice names. It is also my honest belief that overloading is evil and makes programmer's work harder. Side note: Be careful with constructors, they work a bit differently in Vala, than they do in C#. Side note 2: Keep in mind that refcounting behaves very differently from C#'s garbage collecting. You have greater control, but also greater responsibility. Side note 3: Those side notes are probably not necessary, but I'm writing them just in case. :) _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
