Sam Wilson wrote: > Does this qualify as a bug? I'd say yes. (keep in mind it's experimental)
> Because as it stands now, I cannot define > an array of nullable strings (or floats or anything else for that matter) > > another problem I am having a hard time wrapping my head around is > whether or not > > string?[] a = new string?[10]; > > would define an nullable array of strings, or an array of nullable > strings. I'd say it's an array of nullable strings. > Is it possible to define a nullable array of nullable strings? > How? Good questions. I don't think it's possible right now. Would it be "string?[]?" ? Best regards, Frederik _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
