> > Q2.
> > Any hope of getting the following replaced
> > with a better syntax? :-)
> >
> > Idle.add(async_function.callback);
> > yield;
> >
> > Why not simply:
> >
> > yield;
> >
> > ?
> >
>
> Because 'yield' just stops the method until the callback resumes it. It
> does nothing else. You can for example wait for a signal this way.
> Resuming in an idle callback is just one of the possibilities.
Why not
yield Idle;
or even
yield until Idle;
_______________________________________________
Vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
