On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 00:43 +0100, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote: 
> 
> Here's a little trick you might like:
> 
> [code]
> 
> errordomain MyError {
>       FAILED;
> }
> 
> T throwerror<T> (string str) throws Error {
>       throw new MyError.FAILED (str);
> }
> 
> int func ()
> {
>       int? i = null;
>       int j = i ?? throwerror<int> ("hello");
>       return j;
> }
> 
> [/code]
> 

Looks great, but I can't get it to compile with experimental non null
since the ?? operator is returning an 'int?'

IMHO, as nice as this solution is, it seems a bit hackish for a language
that claims to support non-null types.  Overall, Vala provides very few
features that make N.N. types more attractive compared to regular types
and personally I find them a pain to work with

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list

Reply via email to