Hi,
في ث، 08-06-2010 عند 18:41 +0930 ، كتب James Moschou:
> Hi
>
> I'm having trouble debugging my application, I'm getting references suddenly
> becoming null, and I'm finding the existing explanations surrounding memory
> management in vala confusing.
>
> The explanation at http://live.gnome.org/Vala/ReferenceHandling has got:
> > Vala prevents you from assigning an unowned reference to a strong (i.e.
> not unowned) reference. However, you can transfer the ownership to another
> reference with (owned)
>
> But then the tutorial at http://live.gnome.org/Vala/Tutorial has got:
> > If the calling code is written as
> > Object o = get_unowned_ref();
> > Vala will try to either obtain a reference of or a duplicate of the
> instance the unowned reference pointing to
>
> Since I'm not getting compiling errors or warnings I assume that the latter
> is what's happening, but I still don't know exactly what's happening. Is it
> making a copy, increasing the ref count by 1 or transferring ownership?
1. Vala doesn't transfer ownership by default, you need to explicitly
use an (owned) cast.
2. If the class is ref counted, it'll increase its ref count
Else, if it is [Immutable] (e. g. string), it'll make a copy.
Else, it will tell you to explicitly call the copy method.
A strong reference should never become null by itself, so it's either an
unowned reference, or the function you're using returned null for some
reason.
HTH,
Abderrahim
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
