On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 18:41:40 +0200, JM wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have the following programm:
>
> public abstract class AbcAbstr : GLib.Object {
> public abstract async void test_async();
> }
>
> public class ABC : AbcAbstr {
> public override async void test_async() {
> print("test2\n");
> }
>
> public static void main() {
> var abc = new ABC();
> abc.test_async();
> new GLib.MainLoop().run();
> }
> }
>
> The compilation leads to the following problem:
>
> /home/me/Desktop/testasync.vala.c: In function
> ‘abc_abstr_test_async_finish’:
> /home/me/Desktop/testasync.vala.c:93: error: ‘AbcAbstrClass’ has no
> member named ‘test_async_finish’
> error: cc exited with status 256
> Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 0 warning(s)
>
>
> If I change the function name from "test_async" to "test_asyn" it
> works.
> Is that a bug or is this something that is coming from a design towards
> the usage with gio's functions?
I believe it is a bug in the name mangling. An async function is really
three functions -- the start function that initiates the operation, finish
function that retrieves the result and the callback that does the real work.
The name of start function is the same non-async function would get and the
finish function has '_finish' appended. However, if the function name ends
with '_async', it is stripped first (to follow GLib convention). It seems
this stripping is not done consistently when overriding abstract or virtual
async methods. It looks like a bug in vala.
--
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
