> I can imagine a somewhat "dwimmy" feature to support what you want without > actually causing any conflicts, but it would be a bit complicated. The idea > is that when the compiler encounters an unknown symbol and it would know from > the context what type it wants to convert it to (because it's argument to > function or operator of known type), it would look for constant members of > that type.
You took the words right out of my mouth! And when DWIM meets clear definition and determinism that's heaven isn't it? :) Well, it was a suggestion and if people find it less comfortable and more confusing there's no point in implementing it. The difference to C# is a strong point, too. regards andi _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
