Thanks for this. I've updated
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624930 to reflect it, and
included some questions/comments.


-Evan



On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 22:32 +1200, Phil Daintree wrote:
> I have ditched the get_item method since it is depreciated according to 
> the developer of the xmlrpc-c class (and doesn't work!) and added the 
> xmlrpc_array_read_item method (as the vala read_item method) to get 
> array xmlrpc.values as in a return parameter.
> 
> Amended xmlrpc.vapi attached in case anyone else needs this. Tested and 
> works!
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
> 
> On 29/09/10 13:41, Phil Daintree wrote:
> > Pancake, I asked the developer of xmlrpc-c (Bryan Henderson) about my
> > problem. Which by the way occurs even with your example vala code with
> > calls to xmlrpc-c methods that return arrays and of course all the calls
> > that I want to use it for :-(. Bryan was most helpful, it looks like the
> > method used for handling arrays in your bindings is using a depreciated
> > method in the xmlrpc-c library that doesn't do proper reference counting.
> >
> > Although I have no idea what I am doing... I will have a play with the
> > bindings to see if I can get it going. Perhaps a bit early to commit the
> > bindings to the vala code repository until it's stable - otherwise just
> > more work for Evan.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > vala-list mailing list
> > vala-list@gnome.org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
> _______________________________________________
> vala-list mailing list
> vala-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list


_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list

Reply via email to