On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 15:30:29 +0100, pancake wrote: > On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:22:37 +0000 (UTC) > Samuel CUELLA <[email protected]> wrote: > > For the moment, the repository is not accessible from the internet. I'll > > import > > it into the sourceforge subversion service when I have time. [...] > > Why non use git or hg? svn and sourceforge are imho worst solutions for > developers.
Sourceforge now supports all of git, mercurial (hg) and bazaar. They also support trac and mantis as alternate bugtrackers and a handful of other applications. So it's actually usable if you avoid the forge itself and use these "Hosted Apps" (search around their wiki http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/, which is itself a trac installed the same way they offer for projects). > I stopped using sourceforge for security reasons (their servers are not really > secure places) and because of their license agreement and service shutdown > times. That obviously does not address security nor obonxious terms of service. It is somewhat less of a problem if you can easily change hosting though (which distributed version control systems make a lot easier). -- Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
