On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 12:35:26 +0100, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 03/12/2010 alle 17.18 +0100, Abderrahim Kitouni ha
> scritto:
> > > session_proxy.name_acquired.connect (this.name_acquired);
> > What I would have done is:
> >
> > session_proxy.name_acquired.connect ((name) =>
> > this.name_acquired.begin(name));
>
> Ok, cool this works thanks. However in this case the lambda should be
> (p, name) => this.nameacquired.begin(p, name); ;-)
>
> However I guess that this is just a workaround, the related bug should
> be fixed!
It's not a bug. The 'async' is part of the function signature, so the
function signatures don't match and it can't be converted.
It might be a missing feature, but I think it's preferable to explicitly
require the .begin.
> > You can also try to pass the begin method directly (but I'm not sure it
> > works).
>
> No, I tried that, but it didn't work, I got an error since the begin
> return value was considered just like a void.
Hm, the begin function returns a void, but that's what the signal expects
anyway, so it seems like that one should work. That would be a bug than.
--
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
