On 12/13/10, pancake <[email protected]> wrote: > -1 portability is VERY important if we want to use vala outside gnu/linux. > > PD: gcc extensions sucks. > > I would suggest adding support for operator overloading only at vapi > level (via > CCode), so we can create GMP bindings (or OpenSSL Big number) ones and > use the basic types of those libraries are native ones in Vala. >
there's an interesting discussion on D's op. overloading reddit.com/r/programming/comments/eklq0/andrei_alexandrescus_talk_at_accu_silicon_valley/ among others > On 12/12/10 00:39, Aleksander Wabik wrote: >>> when i talked about the complex numbers was because it's interesting to >>> use >>> the C99 spec to reduce the code size in many programs >> +1. I'm for every change in vala that let's it use more and more gcc >> features, and give more control over C code generation. >> >> best regards, >> AW. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
