Em 14-12-2010 19:44, Frederik escreveu:
> On 12/14/2010 07:27 PM, Erick Pérez Castellanos wrote:
> The standard property implementation above can be written shorter:
> public int foo { get; set; }
>
This code gives an error: "... already contains a definition for `_foo'"
private int _foo;
public int foo { get; set; }
Should it happen? The compiler is exposing internal treament to the user.
Is there any intent to change this behaviour?
--
Eduardo Gurgel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
