> > Yes, it's not the same, but it's a similar implementation, using > reference counting (it's not atomic, but if you use an sig_atomic_t ref > variable, instead of the volatile int, you would get atomicity with no > performance loss at all),
Not true I believe. sig_atomic_t ensures atomicity on an entirely different level. It has nothing to do with multi-threaded programming. _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
