I second that. In typical scenarios, where you are not creating hundreds of thousands GLib.Objects all the time, you will have much faster applications with vala.
> On 01/18/11 01:54, "Andrés G. Aragoneses" wrote: > > On 17/01/11 14:08, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Didip Kerabat<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I don't know about any recent benchmarks, but I think Vala will > >> generally be a bit slower than Mono, but more memory efficient. > > > > Slower, really? > > > > Would that be true as well for the dova profile? > i think (not demonstrated) that vala is faster than mono on normal > situations where you > don't build over nine thousand objects per second. > _______________________________________________ > vala-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
