Hello,
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Joseph Montanez
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I got it, I needed
> >
> > public void dostuff (out unowned Soup.Message msg)
> >
> > and then I could do:
> > dostuff(out msg);
> >
No you shouldn't. You probably need to transfer ownership as in:
public void dostuff (out unowned Soup.Message msg) {
...
msg = (owned) ...;
}
btw, why using an out argument? If you need to return only one value,
it'd be easier to use a return value instead.
في ج، 15-04-2011 عند 10:18 -0700 ، كتب Joseph Montanez:
> Actually when I access anything from "msg", it just segment faults :(
>
> https://gist.github.com/922060
What's this? Why do you think you need 'out' here? You should simply
remove the 'out' keyword (and 'unowned' as well, since it would be
unowned by default).
HTH,
Abderrahim
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
