On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:03:05PM +0100, David Given wrote: > After a bit of thought I can see why this happens, as structures are > strictly pass-by-reference, but it nevertheless came as a surprise. > Given that the two cases look very similar but have decidedly different > semantics, is there any chance of getting an error if people use > 'unowned' with a non-value type?
Unowned is just a shallow copy, maybe it should be better explained into the documentation. > Also, before I give up and use pointers, is there any way of getting an > alias to a structure member? No. -- http://www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
