On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:46:09PM -0700, Joseph Montanez wrote:
> This is probably a no brainer but thought it was worth posting.
>
> state.on_score = () => {
> // Reset the ball
> ball.reset_location (engine);
> ball.pause ();
>
> var c = new Circle();
> c.x = engine.width / 2;
> c.y = engine.height / 2;
> c.radius = 34.00;
> engine.sprites.add (c);
>
> engine.add_timer(() => {
> ball.unpause ();
> engine.sprites.remove (c); //<-- CRASH
> }, 3000);
> };
>
>
> In Vala is it correct to assume that anything defined inside an
> anonymous function is not accessible anywhere else, even inside
> another anonymous function that's inside itself? For now I ended up
> moving the object "c" outside of them both and access was fine. I also
> tried tossing around owned and unowned but same results. Is there
> maybe a flag I can use to catch this sort of issue?
If it crashes it's because the delegate parameter of add_timer is not owned,
so you shouldn't use a closure.
--
http://www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
