On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 20:40 -0500, Ryan Lortie wrote: > hi Maciej, > > Thanks for bringing up this topic. I'm not exactly sure what the proper > way forward is, but you raise some interesting possibilities. > > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 01:32 +0100, Maciej Marcin Piechotka wrote: > > I don't think I can fix on libgee side without breaking API/ABI (at > > least I don't see it). I believe that because currently various GNOME > > applications depends on libgee it means that bug effectively breaks > > GNOME (by breaking for example gnome-shell or empathy). > > I talked to Jürg a bit about this problem and I think he decided that > the appropriate thing to do would be to modify Vala to prevent Gee from > doing this in the first place. >
I am afraid that it would still break libgee and indirectly GNOME 3.4 - only at different step (compile time instead of runtime). > > - Change error into warning, remove it from libgee 0.7/0.8 and change > > back into error when the old software die. > > It's just a critical now, so nothing should die. > > I suppose we could downgrade that to a warning if you're worried about > people running with fatal criticals. > Ok. > Cheers > Regards _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
